The PLoS blog has an interesting entry by Richard Cave, PLoS’s IT director, on the topic of unique author identification. If you’ve done more than a couple dozen literature searches, odds are you’ve run into cases where you’ve asked yourself “is I. Niedebeternaym the I. Niedebeternaym I’m looking for?” Sometimes authors share names; sometimes individual authors list their names differently on different papers; and sometimes authors change names (e.g., after getting married). While most of us can probably agree that it’d be nice if unique author IDs existed, there are plenty of technical issues that need be resolved before such a system can be implemented. See the full post for an insightful discussion.
About Small Gray Matters
I’m small and gray, and I study the brain. This is my blog. My email is smallandgray at smallgraymatters dot com more →Tags
adhd
base rates
cancer
cell phones
cognitive neuroscience
connectivity
cowboys
cows
criticism
death
default network
driving
ethics
fmri
google earth
methodology
mri
network structure
neuroscience
nipy
original research
peer review
pharmaceuticals
phiilosophy
publishing
python
religion
review
satellites
science
software
statistics
stimulants
technology
turkey
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.