<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is peer review not peer view? (hint: when Merck pays Elsevier)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallgraymatters.com/2009/05/08/when-is-peer-review-not-peer-view-hint-when-merck-pays-elsevier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallgraymatters.com/2009/05/08/when-is-peer-review-not-peer-view-hint-when-merck-pays-elsevier/</link>
	<description>of brains and their minds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:44:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PLoS releases metrics for all papers &#8211; Small Gray Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.smallgraymatters.com/2009/05/08/when-is-peer-review-not-peer-view-hint-when-merck-pays-elsevier/comment-page-1/#comment-12884</link>
		<dc:creator>PLoS releases metrics for all papers &#8211; Small Gray Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallgraymatters.com/?p=45#comment-12884</guid>
		<description>[...] course, skepticism is probably warranted given the for-profit publishers&#8217; track record of not exactly being eager to do what&#8217;s in the best interest of the scientific community. But perhaps other open-access [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, skepticism is probably warranted given the for-profit publishers&#8217; track record of not exactly being eager to do what&#8217;s in the best interest of the scientific community. But perhaps other open-access [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
